On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 02:32:07PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 03:26:11PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Shouldn't all these new properties be documented somewhere in > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ ? > > Shouldn't the existing binding be documented somewhere there? If someone > documents the existing implementation, I will happily add to it. What > I'm not going to do is to research what the existing bindings are for > this sucker and do the work that the original submitter should have done > in the first place. Let me also point out that these bindings which I'm adding should have been there right from the very start, before the driver was ever accepted into mainline. As the driver stands today, it hard codes the electrical properties of the Freescale Sabre* boards into the driver, which are different from the power on defaults of the device - and this is now something which we're now stuck with since we can't mandate the properties being present, and the defaults have to be the Sabre* board values for everything. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly improving, and getting towards what was expected from it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
