Re: Candidate for late revert ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:11:52PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> OK. And how do you feel about making a disable/unqueued/queued sysfs
> knob? I'd really like to make it easy for the drive vendors to test. And
> if we liberally blacklist their firmware releases then we have
> significantly raised the barrier for their testing. Because all of a
> sudden they need to start mucking with kernel builds instead of booting
> the latest $DISTRO Live CD.

I have no problem with adding debug features as long as it's clear
that it's a debug feature - please gate it with a module param which
clearly indicates that it's for debugging.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux