Hi Andrew, On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 04:12:21PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:16:54AM +0200, Antoine Ténart wrote: […] > I've no idea is this is a good or bad idea, but could you put all the > above code in the phy driver? It does seem to be mostly phy > related. Then teach the core ahci code about optional phy nodes in DT. > You can then probably do without a ahci berlin driver. The code is PHY related, but the setup done is SATA specific. I think it makes sense to keep it here. From what I saw lots of PHY drivers only power up / down the PHYs. Lots of port setups are done in the SATA framework, so it would separate related code into two subsystems. Antoine -- Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html