Re: Storage related regression in linux-next 20120824

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 04:50:47PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On 09/09/2012 04:36 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>I'll send Linus a patch to disable.
> >
> >Thanks, but no, the change in question hasn't reached Linus yet, it's
> >just a linux-next or mmotm thing - isn't it?
> 
> Yep, libata-dev#upstream.  Sorry, got my own branches confused for a
> second there.

Sorry for delay reply.  In our product system, we tested a lot of
different brands of SATA disks, and it is OK after fua is enabled on
default.  Certainly we can't test all disks. :-(

So I think we quite have to revert my patch now, and try to fix the
current problem.

Regards,
Zheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux