Hello, Brian. On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 07:12:30PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > I understand that your original patch was given the "not tested" > disclaimer, but I wanted to know if you had any immediate advice on > why this failed so miserably for me, before I go trying to dig in to > this issue more deeply. For instance, maybe there's been enough code > change between 2.6.37 and 3.3 (or current upstream - 3.6-rc2) that > would require a change in approach. Yeah, I'm not particularly fond of how resume is implemented. It can and should be more asynchronous, I think. :( Unfortunately, I'm a bit too preoccupied at the moment. A quick & dirty hack would be simply skipping ATA_CMD_VERIFY so that the drive spins up on the actual next command. If that's acceptable, just add "goto skip;" right after "if (cdb[4] & 0x1)" test in ata_scsi_start_stop_xlat(). Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
