Re: IRQ issues with multiple SiI3114's on Kernel 3.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 7/27/2012 11:40 AM, Stirling Westrup wrote:
>
>> I recently purchased a large system for use as a backup server for a
>> pair of small businesses. It contains a boot drive plus 10 more
>> storage drives. Despite having three onboard SATA controllers, the
>> motherboard didn't have enough SATA connectors for all the drives, so
>> I installed a pair of identical SiI3114 raid cards to handle the extra
>> connections. It has a Sandy Bridge chipset, so I installed a 3.2
>> kernel.
>>
>> # uname -a
>> Linux ttt 3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Jun 29 20:42:29 UTC 2012
>> x86_64 GNU/Linux
> ...
>> Okay, enough background. Here's the issue: I had no trouble building
>> and sync'ing the first array, but when I try to sync the second array,
>> I always get the following dmesg an hour or so into the process:
>>
>> irq 19: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
>> [  346.120572] Pid: 1100, comm: md1_resync Not tainted
> 3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 #1
>> [  346.120573] Call Trace:
>> ...
>> [  346.120697] handlers:
>> [  346.120699] [<ffffffffa00479e0>] ahci_interrupt
>> [  346.120702] [<ffffffffa02f17ec>] sil_interrupt
>> [  346.120703] Disabling IRQ #19
>> [  346.122145] sched: RT throttling activated
> ...
>> From this point onward syncing drops to a tiny fraction of its
>> previous speed. I've tried booting with 'irqpoll' as the error message
>> suggests, but it has had no effect. I'm really not sure if there is a
>> conflict between my two SiI3114's or between the SiI's and the Marvell
>> controller (although I've never had an issue with Marvell in the
>> past), nor how to go about diagnosing or fixing this.  I'll include a
>> full dmesg dump below, as well as my currently loaded modules. If
>> anyone wants any further info, just ask.
>
> Have you tried irqbalance to spread the interrupts across cores/cache
> domains? https://irqbalance.org/documentation.html
>

Thanks for the tip! I installed irqbalance and rebooted the system,
and everything has been running smoothly for the last two hours. I'll
let everyone know tomorrow if it actually finished the full 20-hour
resync without incidence.


-- 
Stirling Westrup
Programmer, Entrepreneur.
https://www.linkedin.com/e/fpf/77228
http://www.linkedin.com/in/swestrup
http://technaut.livejournal.com
http://sourceforge.net/users/stirlingwestrup
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux