On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 09:43:37AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On 07/26/2012 06:05 AM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> >v3:
> >Rebase on top of scsi-misc tree;
> >Add the sr related patches previously in Jeff's libata tree;
> >Re-organize the sr patches.
> >A problem for now: for patch
> >scsi: sr: support zero power ODD(ZPODD)
> >I can't set a flag in libata-acpi.c since a related function is
> >missing in scsi-misc tree. Will fix this when 3.6-rc1 released.
>
> What does this mean? Would you be more specific?
The patch "libata-acpi: add ata port runtime D3Cold support" by Lin Ming
introduced a function ata_acpi_wake_dev in libata-acpi.c, and only lives
in libata-next tree but not scsi-misc tree.
In patch "scsi: sr: support zero power ODD(ZPODD)" I need to set the
wakeup_by_user flag of the scsi device in ata_acpi_wake_dev like this:
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
@@ -985,8 +985,10 @@ static void ata_acpi_wake_dev(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *context)
struct ata_device *ata_dev = context;
if (event == ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_WAKE && ata_dev &&
- pm_runtime_suspended(&ata_dev->sdev->sdev_gendev))
+ pm_runtime_suspended(&ata_dev->sdev->sdev_gendev)) {
+ ata_dev->sdev->wakeup_by_user = 1;
scsi_autopm_get_device(ata_dev->sdev);
+ }
}
But since there is no such function in scsi-misc tree, I can't set the
flag. Any suggestions?
Another minor issue is, I need to use the can_power_off and
wakeup_by_user flag of the scsi_device structure in sr patches, but
they are all introduced in patches in libata-next tree, so I have to
re-define them in this patch set. Will cause conflict if James send
these sr patches to Linus. Any way to avoid this?
Thanks,
Aaron
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
