On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Lin, > > In the patch d9027470b88631d0956ac37cdadfdeb9cdcf2c99, I did limit the > amount of data cleaning in some of the ata objects. > > If setting err_mask to 0 masks the regression I introduced in the > patch, I may have altered too much how ata_device object is > reinitialized when a device is found. I am digging deeper, I may have > change the code to try to preserve the ering as much as possible. > > Concerning your patch, isn't adding a test (ent->eflags & > ATA_EFLAG_OLD_ER) in ata_count_probe_trials_cb() more in line with > speed_down_verdict_cb() code? Hi, I have updated the patch. [PATCH] libata: skip old error history when counting probe trials http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=133600832126645&w=2 Regards, Lin Ming -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
