On 4/24/2012 12:34 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > I don't think this change is correct. With the old semantics, it was: Sorry. :( > If we have CLK support, we expect there to be a clock for sata_mv, and > if there is no such clock, output a notice message, something is > probably wrong, i expected there to be a clock. > > The new semantics are: > > We expect there to be a clock for sata_mv, and if there is no such > clock, output a notice message, something is probably wrong, i > expected there to be a clock. > > We are going to see this notice message much more, when it is not > expected. So, the only problem is this message? How do you suggest to tackle this now. Have #ifdef,#endif around this print? -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
