On 04/22/2012 01:30 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 16:37 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
When managing shost->host_eh_scheduled libata assumes that there is a
1:1 shost-to-ata_port relationship. libsas creates a 1:N relationship
so it needs to manage host_eh_scheduled cumulatively at the host level.
The sched_eh and end_eh port port ops allow libsas to track when domain
devices enter/leave the "eh-pending" state under ha->lock (previously
named ha->state_lock, but it is no longer just a lock for ha->state
changes).
Since host_eh_scheduled indicates eh without backing commands pinning
the device it can be deallocated at any time. Move the taking of the
domain_device reference under the port_lock to guarantee that the
ata_port stays around for the duration of eh.
Cc: Tejun Heo<tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jacek Danecki<jacek.danecki@xxxxxxxxx>
Could we standardise on Acked-by, please. In my book it means the
maintainer of a piece of code agrees with the change and lets me take it
through my tree. I'm aware that not everyone uses this definition, so
we can use a different standard from my current one, but what does it
mean in this case?
The above, IMO, should be s/Acked-by/Signed-off-by/
FWIW this also has
Acked-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxx>
as noted days ago in another thread.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
