When comparing the dmesg between 3.4-rc3 and 3.4-rc4 I found the
following differences:
-ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xf9fff000 port 0xf9fff100 irq 47
-ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xf9fff000 port 0xf9fff180 irq 47
-ata3: DUMMY
+ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xf9fff000 port 0xf9fff100 irq 47
+ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xf9fff000 port 0xf9fff180 irq 47
ata4: DUMMY
ata5: DUMMY
-ata6: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xf9fff000 port 0xf9fff380 irq 47
+ata6: DUMMY
+ata7: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xf9fff000 port 0xf9fff380 irq 47
The change of numbering comes from commit 85d6725b7c0d7e3f ("libata:
make ata_print_id atomic") that changed lines like
ap->print_id = ata_print_id++;
to
ap->print_id = atomic_inc_return(&ata_print_id);
As the latter behaves like ++ata_print_id, we must initialize
it to zero to start the numbering from one.
Signed-off-by: Tero Roponen <tero.roponen@xxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index 28db50b..23763a1 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static unsigned int ata_dev_set_xfermode(struct ata_device *dev);
static void ata_dev_xfermask(struct ata_device *dev);
static unsigned long ata_dev_blacklisted(const struct ata_device *dev);
-atomic_t ata_print_id = ATOMIC_INIT(1);
+atomic_t ata_print_id = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
struct ata_force_param {
const char *name;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
