Re: How does libata handles an 'ATA_ABORTED' error?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/14/2011 02:48 AM, Juergen Beisert wrote:
Hi list,

I have a CF card running in true-ide mode connected to regular PC. This CF
card does wear leveling of its flash memory internally like every other CF
card. With one exception: When the CF's firmware detects a broken NAND page
while writing a sector, it moves around the remaining (good) data to other
pages. To do this job it must discard the already transmitted sector data in
its SRAM, because it needs this SRAM to move around the other flash memory
data.

After the movement the firmware signals an 'ATA_ERR' in the status register
and an 'ATA_ABORTED' in the error register to force the host to repeat to
write the same data again (next time it will be successfull due to internal
wear leveling is already done).

As we see data lost when the systems are running in production, I'm now trying
to find out if the libata/SCSI layer really repeats the sector write for this
case and does the expected (or required) things. But I'm lost in these
software layers and their error path.

I found (in Documentation/DocBook/libata.tmpl):

"This is indicated by UNC bit in the ERROR register.  ATA
devices reports UNC error only after certain number of
retries cannot recover the data, so there's nothing much
else to do other than notifying upper layer."

which sounds to me as no repeat will happen for write errors, but
the 'ATA_UNC' bit is not used to signal the "wear leveling case" shown above.

That seems like incorrect behavior by the device, ABRT is normally used to indicate an invalid or unsupported command. UNC would likely be more appropriate. But I don't think it ultimately makes a difference in this case.


As far as I understand the ATA errors are transformed to SCSI errors and then
handled in the SCSI layer. But the documentation tells me it is not easy to
always find an adequate SCSI error for an ATA error. So, I'm not sure if for
the "wear leveling case" the SCSI layer receives a "valuable" error message.

From what I can see the SCSI error that gets returned in this case is just an "aborted command" error.


Does anybody can give me a hint, what really happens when the attached drive
signals an 'ATA_ABORTED'? Does the libata/SCSI give up in this case, or will
it repeat the command?

I don't know that the SCSI or block layers really pay much attention to the error code in this case - I think it would always attempt some retries.

Certainly any of these errors would result in error messages showing up in dmesg. Are you seeing any of this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux