On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [Patch description from Alan Stern] > > If a child device was runtime-suspended when a system suspend began, > then there will be nothing to prevent its parent from > runtime-suspending as soon as it is woken up during the system resume. > Then when the time comes to resume the child, the resume will fail > because the parent is already back at low power. > > On the other hand, there are some devices which should remain at low > power across an entire suspend-resume cycle. The details depend on the > device and the platform. > > This suggests that the PM core is not the right place to solve the > problem. One possible solution is for the subsystem or device driver > to call pm_runtime_get_sync(dev->parent) at the start of the > system-resume procedure and pm_runtime_put_sync(dev->parent) at the > end. > > Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@xxxxxxxxx> Hi Alan, May I add your SOB? Thanks, Lin Ming > --- > drivers/scsi/scsi_pm.c | 11 ++++++++++- > 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_pm.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_pm.c > index a633076..bf8bf79 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_pm.c > @@ -72,8 +72,17 @@ static int scsi_bus_resume_common(struct device *dev) > { > int err = 0; > > - if (scsi_is_sdev_device(dev)) > + if (scsi_is_sdev_device(dev)) { > + /* > + * Parent device may have runtime suspended as soon as > + * it is woken up during the system resume. > + * > + * Resume it on behalf of child. > + */ > + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev->parent); > err = scsi_dev_type_resume(dev); > + pm_runtime_put_sync(dev->parent); > + } > > if (err == 0) { > pm_runtime_disable(dev); > -- > 1.7.2.5 > > -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html