Re: [PATCH 10/62] ata: remove the second argument of k[un]map_atomic()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



于 2011年11月29日 03:00, James Bottomley 写道:

I'd vote for as a whole as well, but if there's some legitimate reason
why not, then take them through Jiri's trivial tree; it's pretty trivial
anyway and at least going that way would keep them bisectable.


Ok, I just made a branch which keeps these patches as a single one,

git://github.com/congwang/linux.git #kmap_atomic-single

As the single patch is 233K, so I don't send it to mailing list.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux