On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Yes, it is a problem. �But it looks like the underlying issue is that > >> you're using the SCSI error handler to do something it was not intended > >> for. �Can't you suspend and resume the ATA port without using the error > >> handler? > > > > The system suspend and resume of the ATA port uses the error handler. > > I think the runtime suspend and resume should use the error handler too. > > > > Tejun, > > > > Could you comment more on this? > > I don't know. I haven't really thought about it but as it's currently > designed, I don't think it'll be possible to avoid going through EH to > put ATA ports into suspend mode. Why not? Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
