Hi,
When I developed this patch for the Vortex86dx. I recall trying many
combinations of udma and mwdma. At the time I developed it, I came
to the conclusion that both udma and mwdma both failed with CRC
errors being reported. I am not readily set-up to redo the testing to
see if mwdma is indeed also affected by the errata. It will be a couple
of weeks before I can re-test this patch on the hardware with mwdma
turned on.
Thanks,
Paul
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:16:04 -0500
> Paul Schilling <paul.s.schilling@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> This fixes a DMA issue related to a CRC bug on
>> the RDC pata peripherial found on the vortex86sx and vortex86dx.
>
> What is the RDC erratum reference for this ? Also it seems to make no
> sense
>
>
>> static const struct ata_port_info info_rdc_11 = {
>> .flags = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS,
>> .pio_mask = ATA_PIO4,
>> - .mwdma_mask = ATA_MWDMA2,
>> + .mwdma_mask = 0,
>> + .udma_mask = 0,
>
> MWDMA is not part of the CRC hardware anyway
>
> Are you sure these newer variants are simply not using a different set of
> timing parameters thus showing bugs on your system ?
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
