Re: [git patches] libata updates, GPG signed (but see admin notes)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/29/2011 03:13 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:22:35 EDT, Jeff Garzik said:

    For this reason, I am tempted to modify my new, GPG-signed pull request
    template as follows, for subsequent pull requests:

	---<begin GPG signed text>---

    	pull req description

	"Please pull from $branch\n$url $branch"

	"Top of tree is $sha1_commit"

	---<end GPG signed text>---

	diffstat
	diff

Note that this can be problematic as well - there's probably a lot of tools out there
that will be less than gracious when presented with a GPG-signed text with non-signed
trailing text.  Maybe GPG-sign from "pull request" to "diffstat" and make the diff an
attachment? (That would also allow attaching a gzip'ed diff, which would save vger's
bandwidth :)

I'm not sure I buy that. A GPG-signed email, something that's been around for more than decade, transits the system with unsigned email headers. GPG content is commonly delivered buried inside a larger container.

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux