Hello, On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 10:24:11AM -0800, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote: > case ATA_LPM_MIN_POWER: > - /* no restrictions on LPM transitions */ > - scontrol &= ~(0x3 << 8); > + if (ata_link_nr_enabled(link) > 0) > + /* no restrictions on LPM transitions */ > + scontrol &= ~(0x3 << 8); > + else { > + /* empty port, power off */ > + scontrol &= ~0xf; > + scontrol |= (0x1 << 2); > + } Why not just do the following? scontrol &= ~(0x3 << 8); /* if empty, power off */ if (!ata_link_nr_enabled(link)) { scontrol &= ~0xf; scontrol |= 0x1 << 2; } Also, can you please provide some details on on which hardware you tested the change and how much power it actually saved? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html