On 07/02/2010 04:41 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Jeff. > > So, something like the following. This should be applied on top of > the two previous libata patches. The amount of code in the hot path > is very small. Compared to the cpu actually taking an interrupt and > accessing hardware, it should be negligible, and this will give us > working and acceptably performing systems in the presence of most > types of IRQ problems. The whole tree is available in the following branch. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git libata-irq-expect Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html