RE: [PATCH v4] libata: pata_samsung_cf: Add Samsung PATA controller driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> On 06/14/2010 03:07 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > From: Abhilash Kesavan<a.kesavan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Adds support for the Samsung PATA controller. This driver is based on
the
> > Libata subsystem and references the earlier patches sent for IDE
subsystem.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Abhilash Kesavan<a.kesavan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Send it through the appropriate subsystem tree for this platform...

Hi,

You mean in my case, appropriate subsystem tree is ARM tree.
But I think, as Ben commented, it's better drivers go to upstream via the
driver's tree.
And of course, I read your comments about this like below...
'platform drivers do not build and/or work without additional platform
glue...'

Hmm.
I'm not sure which way is better...

Russell,

How do you think?
May I send this to your patch tracking system?
Or...how should I handle this?

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux