Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:31:35 +0200 > Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> + */ >> +void expect_irq(struct irq_expect *exp) > > > I would like to suggest an (optional) argument to this with a duration > within which to expect an interrupt.... > > that way in the backend we can plumb this also into the idle handler > for C state selection... I'm not sure it's really that useful to power optimize the lost interrupts polling case. It's just a last resort fallback anyways and will be always less power efficient because there will be unnecessary polls. -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
