On Thu, 20 May 2010 16:00:49 +0200 Pierre Ossman <pierre-list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 20 May 2010 12:22:27 +0200 > Pierre Ossman <pierre-list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > I've since constructed a script that keeps re-running the above over > > all relevant disks and keeps track of how many unique md5 values we > > get. It's been running for about 1.5 hours right now, and here are the > > results so far: > > > > sdd - 3, sde - 4, sdf - 1, sdb - 1, sdc - 1, > > > > sdd and sde are both on the same controller, so the problem you > > mentioned could be relevant. > > > > I'll let the test run for a few more hours and try moving things off > > that controller later tonight. > > > > The trend continues and the numbers are now 9 and 8 for sdd and sde and > 1 for the others. > Controller now taken out of the picture and I no longer see any errors on either filesystem nor direct disk level. I have a sil3132 of a different OEM brand here. I'll try that in that pci-e slot next. Rgds -- -- Pierre Ossman WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by FRA, a Swedish intelligence agency. Make sure your server uses encryption for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end encryption.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature