Re: [PATCH 17/23] libata-sff: prd is BMDMA specific

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/18/2010 05:06 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> "bmdma_prd_dma" is a bit too redundant for my tastes.
> 
> I would prefer "bmdma_prd_addr" or similar.

That will be a tad bit confusing w/ the kernel address.  That is
specifically the DMA address of BMDMA PRD table instead of the kernel
visible address.  Given the weird nature of that address, I vote for
weird redundant name.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux