Re: [PATCH] libata: add missing NULL pointer check to ata_eh_reset()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] libata: add missing NULL pointer check to ata_eh_reset()

From Dan's list:

drivers/ata/libata-eh.c +2403 ata_eh_reset(80) warning: variable derefenced before check 'slave'

Please note that this is _not_ a real bug at the moment since ata_eh_context
structure is embedded into ata_list structure and the code alwas checks for
'slave' before accessing 'sehc'.

Anyway lets add missing check and always have a valid 'sehc' pointer (which
makes code easier to understand and prevents introducing some possible bugs
in the future).

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: corbet@xxxxxxx
Cc: eteo@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/ata/libata-eh.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

applied to #upstream-fixes


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux