david@xxxxxxx wrote: > this does not apply to 2.6.30, is there a version of this patch that > would apply to 2.6.30? There isn't one. > also, what testing would need to be done on this before it is a > candidate for -stable? sata_nv saw many disruptions with recent reset protocol update and a lot of changes which looked perfectly okay caused interesting and twisted regressions. I'm not all that confident about pushing this to -stable. It's not like a lot of systems are broken on current 2.6.30 after all. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
