Re: ibata: get rid of ATA_MAX_QUEUE loop in ata_qc_complete_multiple() v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 20 2009, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>> We very rarely (if ever) complete more than one command in the
>> sactive mask at the time, even for extremely high IO rates. So
>> looping over the entire range of possible tags is pointless,
>> instead use __ffs() to just find the completed tags directly.
>>
>> Updated to clear the tag from the done_mask instead of shifting
>> done_mask down as suggested by From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Verified with a user space tester to produce the same results.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/ata/libata-core.c |   11 +++++------
>>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Much cleaner.  Queued...

Thanks!

> Separately, I wonder if we shouldn't add code to report when the  
> hardware gives us an unknown tag.
>
> The code always correctly handles invalid tags passed to us from  
> hardware "if (qc)", but we should probably squawk when that happens, I  
> suspect.

Probably a good idea, it is a sign of bigger problems if the hardware
completes tags that we don't know about.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux