On Fri, May 15 2009 at 12:40am -0400, Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To accommodate stacking drivers that do not have an associated request > queue we're moving the limits to a separate, embedded structure. Given DM motivated this change, any reason you held off including the associated DM changes (in a separate patch in the series)? Your initial DM patch looked reasonable. On some level leaving that patch out of the series prevents reviewers the opportunity to really see why a separate 'queue_limits' structure is even needed. The follow-up question being: is the topology infrastructure adequately equipped to support DM? I think so but having others' review would be nice. Are you looking for such DM changes to be submitted through Alasdair's tree _after_ your changes go upstream through Jens' tree? Regards, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
