On Sunday 17 May 2009 22:30:33 Borislav Petkov wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:18:01PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Sunday 17 May 2009 21:50:51 Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 09:45:45PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > On Sunday 17 May 2009 21:34:09 Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > > > (adding Bart to CC) > > > > > > > > > > Hi Bart, > > > > > > > > > > please take a look at the OOPS below, seems like we BUG() in ide_intr() at > > > > > BUG_ON(!hwif->handler) which shouldn't happen. Full message is at: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1077445. > > > > > > > > > > It is 2.6.29.3 with both PIIX_IDE and ata_piix compiled and it could be > > > > > that those two step on each other's toes, but this is only wild stab in > > > > > the dark. > > > > > > > > > > I'm sure you have more ideas. > > > > > > > > Yes, see my other mail. > > > > > > Saw it right after hitting send. > > > > > > > [ After writing "I will cc: linux-ide on IDE/ATA problems" 100x times > > > > on the whiteboard... ;-) ] > > > > > > And I CC'ed you instead, this has even bigger effect :) > > > > Actually no. > > > > I'm following all IDE discussions on linux-ide anyway and whenever I see > > that I can help immediately I do it (and if I can't the issue gets its > > priority level according to which it will be looked at later). CC:ing me > > on not fully debugged problems is not helping anything. More likely that > > it disrupts the work-flow since people are waiting on me instead of just > > pushing for the solution harder... > > In this case, however, it made more sense to CC you - you know that code > better than me, you have the bunch of experience while I have to read > a ton of stuff before I get up to speed with the problem. You, on the > other hand, have seen similar errors like that before and can at least You seem to forget that I'm not reading LKML regularly but I do linux-ide (I know that the same is true for some other people) so I would have helped much earlier if I had noticed the *initial* mail instead of the most recent at the time... > have a hunch - and you did. Besides, it's not like I'm waiting for you > - I have other things on my plate which I could tackle while you handle > the case you're more knowledgeable at. It is simple as that. That is missing the point -- we are not the only knowledgeable ones here and we definitely want to encourage other people to attack the problems. [ Please read my mail again. I explicitly said "people" not "you" there. ] > But I'll start CCing linux-ide if that's your preference. Thanks but my preferences are not the point here. That is just the most efficient way for everybody: IDE/ATA problems should be handled at linux-ide mailing list. You can still cc: me but cc:ing linux-ide takes priority. Thanks. Bart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
