Re: [PATCH block#for-2.6.31 2/3] block: set rq->resid_len to blk_rq_bytes() on issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 16 May 2009 07:14:44 +0900, Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> So, I could have written
> 
>  if (cmd->act_len >= rq->resid_len)
> 	rq->resid_len = 0;
>  else
> 	rq->resid_len -= cmd->act_len
> 
> Instead I wrote
> 
>  rq->resid_len -= min(cmd->act_len, rq->resid_len);
> 
> It's just capping the amount to be subtracted so that resid_len
> doesn't underflow.  What is so wrong or bad style about that?

Curse of the gifted, I guess. To use a subtraction instead of zero
this way looks like a pointless, even mischievous obfuscation to me.

Also, we probably want a stack_dump or a printk when actual length
exceeds the requested length, don't we? If it ever happens, we
might be overwriting some I/O buffer somewhere.

-- Pete
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux