Re: [PATCH 1/2] libata: add CFA specific identify data words

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
As I see it, there was absolutely no need to rush things -- I simply didn't
get to processing newer submissions yet and I would just push Sergei's patch
in the next IDE pull request (which happened on March 13th).

That is an IDE-centric perspective. It was a cross-tree depedency, and _I_ should not need to wait for you, particularly when you are constantly complaining about lacking time for IDE maintenance.


Simple reminder/query about the patch status would be more than enough but
instead you wasted time for everybody by splitting libata part from Sergei's
patch (without updating patch summary+description which I had to fix) and
later forgotting about it.  Moreover instead of simply pushing forgotten
part yourself you requested Sergei to resubmit it and at the same time you
tried to put the blame about the whole situation on me.

The onus is always on the submittor to monitor their patches, resubmit, etc. It is simply not scalable to constantly ping submittors, keep track of their individual development schedules, etc.

	Jeff


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux