Re: Implementing NVMHCI...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 12 Apr 2009, Alan Cox wrote:

We've abstract the DMA mapping/SG list handling enough that the
block size should make no more difference than it does for the
MTU size of a network.

You need to start managing groups of pages in the vm and keeping them
together and writing them out together and paging them together even if
one of them is dirty and the other isn't. You have to deal with cases
where a process forks and the two pages are dirtied one in each but still
have to be written together.

gaining this sort of ability would not be a bad thing. with current hardware (SSDs and raid arrays) you can very easily be in a situation where it's much cheaper to deal with a group of related pages as one group rather than processing them individually. this is just an extention of the same issue.

David Lang

Alternatively you go for read-modify-write (nasty performance hit
especially for RAID or a log structured fs).

Yes you can do it but it sure won't be pretty with a conventional fs.
Some of the log structured file systems have no problems with this and
some kinds of journalling can help but for a typical block file system
it'll suck.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux