Hello, Grant. Grant Grundler wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Impact: simpler buffer allocation and handling, fix DMA transfers > ... >> + atomic_set(&bh->b_count, bcount); >> if (atomic_read(&bh->b_count) == bh->b_size) > ... > > I'm failing to see why bh->b_count is an atomic_t. > I always assumed tapes were exclusive access devices > and would be serialized at a higher level. Beats me. I don't know. The code is generally pretty over-engineered but, well, it's an ancient piece of code with (probably too) rich history. >> - ide_tape_kfree_buffer(tape); >> - return NULL; >> + bh->b_size = tape->buffer_size; >> + atomic_set(&bh->b_count, full ? bh->b_size : 0); > > No one else could possibly be referencing bh->count at this > point...I like that it's consistent though. Yeah, this patch is just one of logical steps to remove bh, so it doesn't make any other changes than described. The whole bh stuff will be removed later in the series. > The use of atomic won't hurt correctness and this patch looks fine to me. > Please add "Reviewed-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@xxxxxxxxxx>" Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
