On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:02:53 -0600 Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I suppose it makes sense it wouldn't fix this particular problem, though > I think the patch is still correct (and Fujita should likely push it for > -next). In this case it's complaining about a mismatch of one of the > element sizes, not the number of elements which is what it was fixing Yeah, you are right. The patch is correct. But after rereading the dma-debug code, I'm sure that the patch doesn't fix this problem. > Fujita, do you know if there is some other kind of merging that the GART > IOMMU code could be doing that would be tripping up this debug code? Unfortunately, I don't now... I'll check the code later. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
