Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:03:38 -0600
Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Fedora rawhide has the DMA API debug patch applied and it has found this...
From https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485172
WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:439 check_unmap+0x16a/0x3dd() (Tainted: G W
)
Hardware name: System Product Name
sata_nv 0000:00:0d.0: DMA-API: device driver frees DMA memory with different
size [device address=0x00000000da031000] [map size=4096 bytes] [unmap
size=8192bytes]
Modules linked in: bridge stp llc bnep sco l2cap bluetooth sunrpc ip6t_REJECT
nf_conntrack_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables ipv6 cpufreq_ondemand
powernow_k8freq_table dm_multipath uinput snd_hda_codec_analog snd_hda_intel
snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq
snd_seq_device snd_pcm_oss ppdev snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm snd_timer firewire_ohci
snd firewire_core soundcore aic7xxx snd_page_alloc jedec_probe crc_itu_t
forcedeth scsi_transport_spi pcspkr cfi_probe gen_probe sata_sil24 parport_pc
cfi_util parport mtd chipreg i2c_nforce2 map_funcs asus_atk0110 pata_amd
i2c_core hwmon ata_generic pata_acpi sata_nv raid456 async_xor async_memcpy
async_tx xor raid1 sha256_generic cbc aes_x86_64 aes_generic dm_crypt ext4 jbd2
crc16 [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: G W 2.6.29-0.99.rc4.git1.fc11.x86_64 #1
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff81048822>] warn_slowpath+0xb7/0xe7
[<ffffffff8137bc4f>] ? _spin_lock_irqsave+0x78/0x86
[<ffffffff8119851b>] ? get_hash_bucket+0x28/0x34
[<ffffffff8106a5ae>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x1f/0xac
[<ffffffff81198a15>] check_unmap+0x16a/0x3dd
[<ffffffff810388a7>] ? resched_task+0x2e/0x74
[<ffffffff81198d66>] debug_dma_unmap_sg+0x7c/0x9b
[<ffffffff8106a648>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff8124fef9>] ata_sg_clean+0x96/0xd0
[<ffffffff8124ff89>] __ata_qc_complete+0x56/0xc9
[<ffffffff8125018b>] ata_qc_complete+0x18f/0x198
[<ffffffffa00cb249>] nv_swncq_interrupt+0x358/0x688 [sata_nv]
That's rather curious. It seems to be saying that the sg length is
different between the map and unmap, but it doesn't look like sata_nv
mucks with that anywhere, and neither does libata core..
Could the SCSI code have merged two requests?
I wouldn't think so.. and if it did it seems like it would have to have
changed the list after libata got the request somehow..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
