Re: [PATCH] ide/libata: fix ata_id_is_cfa()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:45:00 +0300
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> >>>+	if (id[ATA_ID_MAJOR_VER] == 0xFFFF)
> >>>+		return 0;
> >>>+	return (id[ATA_ID_MAJOR_VER] & (1 << v)) ? 1 : 0;
> 
> >>    Refer to afa_dev_cf_sata() on how it's done in really optimal way.
> 
> > To what ? - there is no ata or afa_dev_cf_sata ?
> 
>     Very funny. Meant to be ata_dev_is_sata(), of course.

We don't have one of those either - do you mean ata_id_is_sata ? If so
then yes that looks like it might be slightly cleaner although its
probably one instruction difference from the .s files.

I'll redo it that way
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux