On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Mark Lord <liml@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Tejun / Jeff,
>
> I am working on MSI support for sata_mv, and am trying to puzzle out
> exactly what the kernel expects for this. Looking at other drivers,
> both libata and otherwise, yields a variety of conflicting implementations.
>
> For starters, the MSI HOW-TO suggests that drivers must be careful
> to invoke pci_disable_msi() on module unload, but I don't see that
> happening anywhere in libata.
I don't think that's necessary if free_irq() or disable_irq() are called.
However, I'm not seeing those get called either.
>
> Unless, Tejun, the devm_* routines automatically do this.. do they?
>
> Next, there's no mention of a need for invoking pci_intx() in the HOW-TO,
> yet some device drivers call it, and others do not.
In general, I don't think drivers need to call pci_intx().
I'm really not sure why it's exported even.
>
> Eg. from ahci.c, we have this:
>
> if ((hpriv->flags & AHCI_HFLAG_NO_MSI) || pci_enable_msi(pdev))
> pci_intx(pdev, 1);
>
> Which agrees with the existing code in sata_mv:
>
> if (msi && hi jiqi(pdev))
> pci_intx(pdev, 1);
Combined with the fact that we can't find where MSI is disabled,
this bit of code in pci_enable_msi() might cause MSI reload to fail:
/* Check whether driver already requested for MSI-X irqs */
if (dev->msix_enabled) {
dev_info(&dev->dev, "can't enable MSI "
"(MSI-X already enabled)\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
> Which seems to call pci_intx() only when MSI is *not* used. Fine.
> But then in sata_vsc.c, we do sort of the opposite:
>
> if (pci_enable_msi(pdev) == 0)
> pci_intx(pdev, 0);
>
> Either that one is wrong, or pci_intx() is unnecessary in all cases.
Neither. Code in sata_vsc.c is redundant and can be removed.
pci_intx() is necessary in some broken cases where INTX
has to be _enabled_ for MSI to work:
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0710.3/0772.html
> Again, the MSI HOW-TO doesn't even mention this routine.
>
> Looking through the network drivers, it seems that some of them
> do the pci_intx(pdev,1) call for the cases where pci_enable_msi() fails,
> similar to ahci.c and sata_mv.c.
>
> But not all of them do that.
Jeff Garzik seems to like that construct:
>
> Perhaps somebody from the PCI side of things might enlighten us all.
http://lists.linuxcoding.com/kernel/2005-q3/msg11296.html
Shows when pci_intx() was added. linux-pci was NOT cc'd on that email.
And no one asked for Documentation/ update. C'est la vie.
BTW, gregkh is very good about posting patches when sending a pull request
to linus. But that just means it was likely buried in a pile of 50+ patches.
grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
