> > I'm afraid you are the one who is wrong. The IDE layer is duplicating a > > generic level of indirection with its own code - purely because IDE > > pre-dates that core functionality. The whole IDE layer indirection can go > > away because Linux has caught up with the needs of the IDE layer. > > What IDE indirection you're talking about anyway? As I said earlier ide_mm_inb etc via the function pointers tf_inb/tf_outb etc. Given how small those functions are it might even be worth rolling them into two different versions of the functions like ide_tf_read as surely it costs more to call them (in size) than to inline the two for those functions? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
