On Sunday 18 January 2009, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Sunday 18 January 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> There is a name conflict with a change applied after this patchset had > >>> been created. The appended patch fixes it for me. > >> [...] > >>> @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ const struct dmi_system_id *dmi_first_match(const struct dmi_system_id *list) > >>> const struct dmi_system_id *d; > >>> > >>> for (d = list; d->ident; d++) > >>> - if (dmi_match(d)) > >>> + if (dmi_matches(d)) > >>> return d; > >> I get two warnings when compiling your patch with this correction on top: > > > > Hm, there were more patches than one, so I'm not sure. When I apply all of > > them, I don't see these error, but perhaps I should resend the entire series. > > Will do tomorrow. > > That would be useful... I was planning to regenerate the series, but > this would save time. The rebased series follows. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
