>
> The patch adds entries for 0xFFFF (is that really right) as a
> bridge and
> 0xC409 - I see nothing for 0x0571.
PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_ANON is used to stand for Unknown South Bridge for VX855
and future chips, since the pata_via has a southbridge check, which is redundant.
If we may VIA has a new SB with new bridge ID which in not in the check list, whose
IDE controller is 0x0571. Linux default pata_via can not drive IDE controller of 402, since
the southbridge check in pata_via can not pass.
So we add PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_ANON to stand for our future southbridge,
and this will help to pass southbridge check.
Is it possible to do this way? And can it be acceptable in kernel policy?
> Also all the second port stuff is unneeded: Just do
>
> if (has_one_port)
> ppi[1] = &ata_dummy_port_info;
>
> and only the first port will be probed.
>
We will check it out. Thanks. :)
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��'^�)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
