> Unfortunately "generally" here means that once there is some more > advanced driver functionality needed (i.e. error handling) it fails > in the major way... Thus leaving it there is confusing for users Whereas removing it ensures it doesn't work in the first place, which is a regression and pointless. > Still, we can certainly leave ide-scsi there if you or somebody else > want to maintain it (which didn't happen for the last year). It would > be best to start with fixing years long issues with error handling and > taking the work on updating driver for IDE changes off my shoulder... You could just stop turning the old IDE driver into an experimental playground. The problems are only arising because old IDE is being continually changed (frequently in directly the reverse direction it came over the years) Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
