Re: [PATCH] libata: Better timeout recovery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I'd very much prefer comments to be formatted like this:

Would you... ;)

> > +	/* Can become DEBUG later */
> > +	if (count)
> > +		ata_port_printk(ap, KERN_WARNING,
> > +			"drained %d bytes to clear DRQ.\n", count);
> > +
> > +}
> 
> Presumably, you didn't intentionally leave a blank line before the
> closing brace.

Yes I did, it looked cleaner.

> Sorry if you were aware of all that and just sent the patch as a first
> draft in order to get comments on the actual code.

At the moment the main concern is the code quality - but you are right
I've not run the result through the style checker and probably should do
so.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux