Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 1. How should the shock interface look like? As we're gonna need > userland daemon one way or the other, we can use the userland > daemon to glue all the interfaces but it would be much better to > have a unified interface. Although there seem to be several > different variants, they don't differ all that much and creating a > new interface every time is painful. I think we can get by with a > sysfs interface with notification. It should provide a connection to the corresponding device. Imagine an USB case having a sensor, being connected to a desktop system. You would want to exactly protect the enclosed USB device, and possibly non-protected USB devices, too, but not halt the internal disks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
