Hello.
Kevin Hilman wrote:
The sff_dma_ops struct should be wrapped by BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_SFF instead
of BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI.
Oops, I sent the wrong version of this patch. Here's a better version
which moves sff_dma_ops into an existing #ifdef block.
Kevin
From d9c182b5109591b9a28384991bcd820554fad371 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:31:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] IDE: compile fix for sff_dma_ops
The sff_dma_ops struct should be wrapped by BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_SFF instead
of BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[...]
diff --git a/include/linux/ide.h b/include/linux/ide.h
index eb1721c..cf95ca7 100644
--- a/include/linux/ide.h
+++ b/include/linux/ide.h
[...]
@@ -1276,6 +1275,7 @@ int ide_dma_test_irq(ide_drive_t *);
extern void ide_dma_lost_irq(ide_drive_t *);
extern void ide_dma_timeout(ide_drive_t *);
extern const struct ide_dma_ops sff_dma_ops;
+extern const struct ide_dma_ops sff_dma_ops;
#endif /* CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_SFF */
Somethiung went wrong again. Do you see what? :-)
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
