Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes] libata: Add transport class for libata

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 01:34:04PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
>> Could you make it configurable, so that people who don't need this
>> interface can build the kernel without it?
> 
> Please, no.  Don't we already have enough CONFIG options?

I agree that CONFIGurability should be minimal only as far as essential
functionality is concerned.  What is proposed here doesn't look
essential to me.  (Essential in order to support a broad range of
hardware or of usage scenarios, that is.)  Hence it should be off by
default, if it is added at all.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- =--- =--==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux