Alan Cox wrote: >>> BTW. Tejun, I suppose that usually starting DMA after issuing the >>> command is a standard practice of legacy/sff type controllers ? Or it's >>> just because that's how linux did it until now ? >> It's how the standard says it should be programmed. Please take a look >> at section 3 of the following document. >> >> http://www.centrillium-it.com/Projects/idems100.pdf >> >> It's a non-issue for PATA ones as the host is responsible for running > > It's very much an issue for PATA. If you start the DMA before time things > go wrong. The DMA has to start after the command is issued (or for ATAPI > after the command and the cdb are issued). Various ATAPI devices get > quite cross if you mess this up. > > In some cases the driver code also depends upon this as we software drive > the data clocks so have to reprogram them after command issue and before > data transfer begins. I was saying drive getting ready before command issue was non issue. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
