On Thu, 29 May 2008 14:25:58 -0400 Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > maybe_altstatus is crap naming but simply making ata_sff_altstatus fake a > > reply in arbitary cases risks not catching mistakes and could mean we > > don't catch corrupting mistakes which would be very bad indeed. > > Please grep the remaining users, IMO you will find that's not really > true. After your patch no core users remain, only ones in a few > scattered drivers that most likely want your logic (or a > simplified-for-that-controller version thereof). I did check them all and review them and read the documentation right back to the original 1010 controller behaviour. I stand by my comment. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
