Re: [PATCH] ata: fix sleep-while-holding-spinlock in sata_nv

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Arjan van de Ven wrote:
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] ata: fix sleep-while-holding-spinlock in sata_nv

blk_queue_bounce_limit() is a sleeping function, so reorganize
the code a little to not call it while holding a spinlock.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/ata/sata_nv.c |    8 +++++---
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c b/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c
index 858f706..a7bc56d 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c
@@ -671,6 +671,11 @@ static int nv_adma_slave_config(struct scsi_device *sdev)
 	port1 = ap->host->ports[1]->private_data;
 	sdev0 = ap->host->ports[0]->link.device[0].sdev;
 	sdev1 = ap->host->ports[1]->link.device[0].sdev;
+
+	blk_queue_segment_boundary(sdev->request_queue, segment_boundary);
+	blk_queue_max_hw_segments(sdev->request_queue, sg_tablesize);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags);
+
 	if ((port0->flags & NV_ADMA_ATAPI_SETUP_COMPLETE) ||
 	    (port1->flags & NV_ADMA_ATAPI_SETUP_COMPLETE)) {
 		/** We have to set the DMA mask to 32-bit if either port is in
@@ -701,14 +706,11 @@ static int nv_adma_slave_config(struct scsi_device *sdev)
 					       pp->adma_dma_mask);
 	}
- blk_queue_segment_boundary(sdev->request_queue, segment_boundary);
-	blk_queue_max_hw_segments(sdev->request_queue, sg_tablesize);
 	ata_port_printk(ap, KERN_INFO,
 		"DMA mask 0x%llX, segment boundary 0x%lX, hw segs %hu\n",
 		(unsigned long long)*ap->host->dev->dma_mask,
 		segment_boundary, sg_tablesize);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags); return rc;
 }

I'm not certain this is safe to do it quite this way. It would be better to keep that spinlock held so that no operations could be in progress on either port while these operations are happening.

It would be better to fix the regression from 419c434c35614609fd0c79d335c134bf4b88b30b in block/blk_settings.c that resulted in the blk_queue_bounce_limit allocation wrongly allocating emergency ISA pages in the first place as a 32-bit DMA mask does not need them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux