Re: 2.6.25 semantic change in bay handling?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 11:29:35AM +0200, Holger Macht wrote:

> Right, so you never can rely on receiving a BAY_EVENT. Why not just
> disregard this case and looking for a common solution?

Oh, I agree - we need to solve this in any case. But for hardware where 
there is a separate request event before the device is pulled, users 
already have scripts that prompt them to unmount hardware. These worked 
in <2.6.25, but they're broken now. It'd be nice to get them working 
again.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux