Re: new ata_port_operations for .pmp_{read,write} ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Garzik wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Yeah, exactly.  I think what needs to be done is to separate out SFF
assumptions from core layer, factor out SFF-proper helpers and use them
to implement LLDs for quasi-SFF controllers.


Thinking long term, I continue to hope that SFF support can eventually be separate into a sub-API, allowing people to disable (at compile time) SFF support completely if they don't need it.
..

I can think of a few more pressing things to disable before that.

Like ACPI and PMP.  Modularizing those (or more crudely de-selecting them
at build time) would save a lot of memory on small embedded boxes.

Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux