Re: ICH7: ata_piix twice as fast as ahci?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/2/17, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:41:42 +0100
> Joris <joris@xxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hello List,
> >
> > Odd problem on my machines: the sata disks appear to be a lot slower
> > when used via ata_piix vs the ahci driver.
>
> I would expect that. AHCI allows the use of NCQ and unloads a ton of work
> from the processor. It also means you pretty much avoid the inter command
> latency that limits standard IDE performance.

Alan,

>From your response I'm not sure if I made clear that ata_piix was
faster, and ahci slower?

Am I interpreting this correctly as having to choose between fast iops
with low cpu (+ hotplug) with ahci and twice the linear read speed
with ata_piix?



Kind regards,
Joris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux